AI Usage and Risk Policy

Effective Date: June 22, 2026 · Last revised: October 2, 2026

1. Purpose and Scope

This policy describes how Docwright Software LLC ("DocWright") manages risk associated with the optional AI-assisted features within the DocWright application (alt text, equation descriptions, and scanned-page transcription). It applies to DocWright's use of third-party AI provider APIs: the Anthropic Claude API, the Google Gemini API, and Azure OpenAI. Each install uses one provider, chosen by the institution. DocWright does not develop, train, host, or operate any AI or machine learning model itself.

2. Two-Layer Risk Model

DocWright's AI risk posture rests on two distinct layers, and this policy is deliberate about not conflating them:

Layer 1 — Underlying infrastructure (the AI provider's responsibility)

The AI provider the institution has configured is responsible for its own infrastructure, security program, and data handling. Anthropic publishes SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA compliance certifications covering the Claude API. Google (Gemini API) and Microsoft (Azure OpenAI) publish their own compliance documentation, which DocWright has not independently assessed. DocWright relies on the provider's infrastructure rather than duplicating it.

Layer 2 — DocWright's own integration risk (DocWright's responsibility)

Separately, DocWright is responsible for how it integrates and constrains its use of that API. This policy addresses that second layer specifically — it is not a restatement of a provider's certifications, but a description of DocWright's own design choices that limit risk in how the API is used.

3. DocWright's Risk-Limiting Design Choices

4. Human Oversight

AI-generated descriptions are inserted into the processed document automatically, without requiring approval prior to insertion. Scanned-page transcriptions work differently: each is shown to the user for review and editing before it is embedded. However, the user retains the original file alongside the processed file and a fix report listing all AI-generated content, allowing review and manual editing of any description before final use (e.g., before uploading to the institution's LMS). DocWright considers this post-hoc review workflow appropriate given the low-stakes, easily reversible nature of the output (descriptive alt text, not a decision affecting any individual).

5. Incident Response for the AI Feature

Because the AI feature depends entirely on an institution-supplied API key, it can be disabled immediately by removing or not renewing that key in the application's Settings panel (or by not providing one at deployment) — no DocWright-side action or reinstall is required. This is the primary control available in the event of an identified issue with the feature.

6. Current Limitations

DocWright does not yet have a formal, written AI risk-management framework modeled on a published standard (e.g., NIST AI RMF), nor a dedicated AI governance function, consistent with the company's current single-founder structure. DocWright's provider choice is not centrally locked, and DocWright cannot see which service tier an API key belongs to; both are described above. This policy represents DocWright's current, good-faith documentation of its actual AI risk-limiting practices, and will be expanded as the company grows.

7. Related Documents

8. Contact

Gregory Buthusiem, Founder & Managing Member

Docwright Software LLC

contact@docwright.org

(856) 817-5100

docwright.org